![freebsd meminfo cpuinfo freebsd meminfo cpuinfo](https://i1.wp.com/www.learnsteps.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/nginx.png)
![freebsd meminfo cpuinfo freebsd meminfo cpuinfo](https://sites.google.com/site/alexboehmer3600/_/rsrc/1425313968228/home/week07/1-download-the-first-4-images-on-qemu-org-testing-linux-freebsd-minix-and-freedos-for-the-unix-variants-a-show-a-listing-of-bin-and-sbin-and-dev-b-show-what-s-in-the-file-system-table-the-password-file-and-the-services-file-c-what-do-the-cpuinfo-and-meminfo-files-tell-you/Minix_passwd.png)
I didn't think it would make that much of a difference! I know the Rackspace "server" is whitebox because we opted for a lower-price hosting solution. Our inhouse servers were Compaq Proliant M元50's with Compaq SmartArray RAID controllers running FreeBSD5.1. We migrated to Rackspace from inhouse servers. What is a respectable buffered read value for "hdparm -tT"? Even if it is not the most accurate/reliable of stats, it sounds as if I am on the weak end.Īs I said, this is a remote machine at a data center that I have not seen. Of course it is before 8:00pm CST and the server basically has nothing else going on at the moment. Hugepagesize: 4096 like the server is going to make a liar of me when it comes to server load. Total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached: Pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext lm 3dnowext 3dnow Model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+įlags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov Ok, I ran "tar -cvzf /sites/" (about 4-5gb in site) and here is my top:Ġ7:16:51 up 98 days, 42 min, 6 users, load average: 1.43, 0.90, 0.47ġ07 processes: 103 sleeping, 4 running, 0 zombie, 0 stoppedĬPU states: cpu user nice system irq softirq iowait idle The truth is, 35MB/sec is about all that controller will do (yes, it's crap), and the 140MB/sec throughput that someone else posted is way above average and not the kind of throughput one would expect on a 2-disk RAID1 array. Another said "My cached reads look similar to yours, but my buffered disk reads seem a heck of a lot slower." as if that indicated a problem. And I'm getting 35.56 MB/s buffered disk reads." as if that means the SCSI array is as slow as a laptop drive. At the moment, it is on battery power, in power-saving mode, and the CPU is downlocked 50%. Yes, "hdparm -t" can give you an indication that I/O is about normal, but I was referring to posts such as "I have a laptop. SCSI is about low access times which improves throughput on highly randomized I/O (like what a web server does).īecause it's a sign of what the physical device can do in the best case, even if he won't be getting that all of the time in regular usage. It's no surprise ATA does as well as (or better than) SCSI on that test. It just gives an indication of sequential read transfer rates which is rarely a real-world workload. Why is anyone posting "hdparm -t" like it's a real benchmark? It's not. Nov 1 17:01:51 web01 kernel: sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 Nov 1 17:01:51 web01 kernel: Partition check: Nov 1 17:01:51 web01 kernel: Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 Nov 1 17:01:51 web01 kernel: scsi0: scanning physical channel 0 for devices. Nov 1 17:01:51 web01 kernel: scsi0: scanning virtual channel 2 for logical drives. Nov 1 17:01:51 web01 kernel: scsi0: scanning virtual channel 1 for logical drives. Nov 1 17:01:51 web01 kernel: Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 Nov 1 17:01:51 web01 kernel: scsi0: scanning virtual channel 0 for logical drives. Nov 1 17:01:51 web01 kernel: scsi0 : LSI Logic MegaRAID 1元7 254 commands 15 targs 4 chans 7 luns Nov 1 17:01:51 web01 kernel: megaraid: channel is raid. Nov 1 17:01:51 web01 kernel: megaraid: supports extended CDBs. Nov 1 17:01:51 web01 kernel: megaraid: detected 1 logical drives
#Freebsd meminfo cpuinfo 64 Bit
Nov 1 17:01:51 web01 kernel: scsi0 : Enabling 64 bit support Nov 1 17:01:51 web01 kernel: scsi0 : Found a MegaRAID controller at 0xf883c000, IRQ: 10